Join LPP
Donate LPP
Al Khobar: Sins of Parents Visting Upon Children

Related Articles

By Farooq Sulehria

The Al Khobar assault-and-hostage drama finished Sunday leaving 25 dead, including a Swede. The Saudi commandos freed 50 foreign hostages including seven American hostages in a raid to end an attack on the Saudi oil industry launched by suspected Al Qaida militants. This was the fourth incident in a months time in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia where Al-Qaida militants attacked or were attacked by Saudi police. The death toll including Al Khobar is 37 in May.

In a year time, there have been 12 different incidents including suicide bombings, where Al-Qaida attacked either foreigners or had gun battles with Saudi police. Al Khobar itself has been victim of Al Qaida attack in less than seven years. Last time it was attacked in 1997. Recent assault-and-hostage drama is just a link in the chain of incidents that first unfolded on November 20, 1979 when a group of Wahabi extremists took over Grand Mosque in Mecca on the occasion of Hajj.

The Hajj is one of the five pillars of Islam. Muslim from across the Islamic world travels to Mecca to perform Hajj (pilgrimage). A group of 500 (figures vary from 200 to 1200) militants led by Juhaiman ibn Muhammad ibn Saif al Utaiba took 600 Pilgrimage hostage. The hostage drama went on for two weeks when it finally was ended with the help of French commandos. Interestingly, no non-Muslim is supposed to enter the Holy city of Mecca. Legend has it that al Utaiba, grandson of a tribal ally-turned-rival of Abdul Aziz Ibn Saud, had planned to kidnap Shah Khalid, the then Saudi king, and force him to abdicate. Juhaiman's justification was that the Sauds had lost legitimacy through corruption, ostentation, and mindless imitation of the West--virtually an echo of his grandfather's charge in 1921 against Abd al Aziz ibn Saud, founder of Saudi kingdom.

Juhaiman's accusations against the Saudi monarchy also resembled Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's diatribes against the Shah of Iran. The king, Shah Khaild, that day had stomach ache and did not turn up at the Grand Mosque. It was 600 pilgrimages who were taken hostage instead. The incident shook the Muslim world. 'It is Jewish conspiracy', was the common reaction in Pakistan; perhaps across the Muslim world. The uprising was crushed leaving 200 dead (figures however vary from 75 to 500).

Leaders on the leaders of 'uprising' were publicly beheaded, as is the 'ritual' in the kingdom. Taliban later on were just imitating Sauds. In 1980, a Shia uprising in south of the kingdom also met the same fate. Saudi Shias, oppressed and deprived as they are even today, enthused by Khomeni's return started an uprising. Shah Khalid moved 200,000 National Guards and it was brutally crushed. The kingdom was again 'peaceful', ruled with an iron fist by corrupt House of Sauds until 1996. Much of the opposition in the kingdom in 1980s was externalised. It was diverted towards Soviet Union through Afghan war. The oppositionists were encouraged to reach Pakistan to join 'Jihad 'against Soviet 'infidels'. The kingdom stayed peaceful until 1996 when a bombing in Riyadh reminded Sauds of al-Utaiba.

This time it was Osama bin Laden playing al-Utaiba. Osama however survived the fate al-Utaiba met. It was because Osama, deprived of his Saudi nationality in the wake of first Gulf War, had been exiled. Interestingly, Osama, like al Utaiba, was a friend of Saud family too. Osama's charges were not different from al-Utaiba. However, there was a demand that al-Utaiba had not presented: withdrawal of US troops from kingdom.

The US presence was not new. It was during the Second World War, the allied built a big air force base at Dhahran. It was to defend oil….the blood of war. The black gold had already been discovered in the deserts. Following the First Gulf War, the then US defence Secretary Dick Cheney moved 200,000 troops to Saudi Arabia. The purpose was to 'liberate' Kuwait from Iraq's 'Hitler'. Osama, a veteran of Afghan war, did not like the policy. He wanted Kuwait be liberated through an army of Afghan war veterans.

The House of Saud did not want, in the longer run, an army comprising of local Arabs. Also, an army with radical Islamic agenda was not acceptable. Saudia has been traditionally a kingdom that never had an army comprising local. It was to avoid a coup. It also cleverly avoided building a working class comprising of Saudis. It was to avoid a revolution.
In a country of 21 million, there are seven million 'guest workers'. Largest is Pakistani expatriate community: 750, 000. Others mainly come from India, Bangladesh, Philippines and Sri Lanka. The workers work in horrendous conditions deprived of any trade union rights; any job security and so on.

In exile, Osama not only managed to rebuild his old Al-Qaida army but for House of Sauds he also became what once Khomeni was for Shah. If one goes by the analysis of ex-CIA Middle East "field officer" and author of "Sleeping With the Devil", Robert Baer, Osama today in Saudia is as popular as Khomeni once was in Iran. He will sweep elections in Saudi Arabia in case there are elections, Baer thinks. And this is what new cons call 'dilemma of democracy'. They do not want democracy in any 'kingdom' fearing the victory of some Osama. In the name of 'Islamic culture', they also try to prove that democracy do not comply with Muslim culture. They are not very different from Ayub Khan, the first military dictator of Pakistan. Ayub had justified his take over saying democracy was not a system for countries with warm weather like Pakistan, it is only good for countries like Great Britain with cold weather.

Khomeni while sitting in Paris was smuggling his recorded speeches and writings in Tehran. Osama on the contrary was sending suicide bombers, kidnappers and gun totters. This is making everybody nervous. House of Sauds is nervous: opposition is growing despite repression. White House cannot be trusted as it might deal with anyone in charge of oil fields. Honestly, the American right and Osama, among other things, are also having in common the agenda to demolish the House of Sauds. Imperialism is nervous: oil prices are reaching new heights. Never have been prices so high in last 20 years. Resistance in Iraq is proving a catalyst to spread resistance in Saudi kingdom. Putting House of Sauds in order is not possible. Osama has many friends in that house. Moreover, opposition will keep growing in case present regime continues. Reforms may usher in a break up of the order imperialism has so painstakingly built since 1932 when Kingdom of Saudi Arabia was established by Ibn Saud.

The sins of mother: British imperialism are visiting upon child: US imperialism. The puritan Wahabi state was built, with British weapons, only to guard oil reserves for the exploitation of British and US oil companies. The foundations of new kingdom were laid in the name of Puritanism. The Puritanism demanded the revival of seventh century Islam to justify the rule of Ibn Saud as against the rule of Sherifs of Hijaz who had gone corrupt. The only solution to end Sherif's corruption was puritan Islam. No other alternative was tolerated, allowed or practised. Liberalism, democracy, human rights, freedom of expression, all were contrary to Puritanism hence crushed. The sins of Abdul Aziz ibn Saud are visiting his son Fahd bin Abdul Aziz now lying on death bed. It remains to be seen what ends first: Fahd's life or rule?

Up Email Print Articles Home  
© Pakistan Labor Party
All rights reserved, any contents provide on this site are sole property of this site web site