By Khalid Hassan
Washington: Freedom House, which monitors the sate of freedom around
the world every year, has placed Pakistan among countries where
the press is Not Free.
According to Freedom House which released the survey this week,
Pakistan dropped from Partly Free to Not Free because of
increased official harassment of journalists and media outlets,
in addition to passage of a bill that increased penalties for
defamation. The moves followed other aggressive measures taken
over the last two years by military authorities to silence critical
or investigative voices in the media. A number of journalists
have been pressured to resign from prominent publications, charged
with sedition, or arrested and intimidated by intelligence officials
while in custody. Only two countries - Pakistan and Kenya
- registered a negative category shift in 2004, moving from Partly
Free to Not Free. Pakistan was also among countries where Freedom
House said notable setbacks had taken place. Others
so listed were Kenya, Mexico, Venezuela, and in the United States
itself.
While press freedom registered important gains in some key countries
in 2004, notable setbacks occurred in the United States and elsewhere
in the Americas, according to the study.
Increased restrictions were also detected in parts of Asia, Africa,
and the former Soviet Union. The study - Freedom of the Press
2005: A Global Survey of Media Independence - revealed that gains
outnumbered setbacks, as measured by shifts among the surveys
three main categories: free, partly free and not free. Improvements
took place in countries where new democratic openings have been
achieved or are burgeoning, such as in Ukraine and Lebanon. Several
countries in the Middle East showed positive trends.
While the United States remained one of the strongest performers
in the survey, its numerical score declined due to a number of
legal cases in which prosecutors sought to compel journalists
to reveal sources or turn over notes or other material they had
gathered in the course of investigations. Additionally, doubts
concerning official influence over media content emerged with
the disclosures that several political commentators received grants
from federal agencies, and that the Bush administration had significantly
increased the practice of distributing government-produced news
segments.
Out of the 194 countries and territories examined, 75 (39 percent)
were rated Free, while 50 (26 percent) were rated Partly Free
and 69 (35 percent) were rated Not Free.
According to the survey, five countries improved in category
while two declined. In addition to Ukraine and Lebanon, Guatemala
and Guinea-Bissau moved from Not Free to Partly Free, while Namibia
moved from Partly Free to Free. The five worst rated countries
in 2004 were Burma, Cuba, Libya, North Korea, and Turkmenistan.
In these states, independent media are either non-existent or
barely able to operate, the role of the press is reduced to serving
as a mouthpiece for the ruling regime, and citizens access
to unbiased information is severely limited, Freedom House said.
|